by: Tryggvi ThayerPosted on:

Fékk eitt Internet sent heim. Það kemur víst í túpu.

2.7.2006 kl. 20:50

Fékk eitt Internet sent heim. Það kemur víst í túpu.

Eins og ég hef sagt frá áður , finnst sumum netþjónustuaðilum í USA að þeir eigi að mega láta upplýsingaveitur borga fyrir forgang um netið. T.d. að netþjónustuaðili fær greiðslu frá Yahoo til að tryggja að kúnnar viðkomandi netþjónustuaðila fái upp síður Yahoo fljótar en t.d. Google. Nú er verið að afgreiða ný fjarskiptalög í USA og hafa þeir sem vilja tryggja að netþjónustuaðilar geti ekki farið að mismuna aðilum með þessum hætti reynt að fá samþykkt ákvæði sem tryggir að netið verði hlutlaust, þ.e.a.s. að allir hafi jafnan aðgang og séu jafnir á netinu. Fyrir nokkru fór þetta fyrir Senate (önnur þingdeildin þar ytra) og var ákvæðinu hafnað. Ted Stevens frá Alaska, sem hefur setið á þinginu í næstum 40 ár, var einn þeirra sem var á móti því að ákvæðið kæmist í lögin. Nýlega var hann spurður af hverju hann hafnaði ákvæðinu. Hann hefði betur átt að segja sem minnst. En það gat hann ekki, verandi svona mikilvægur og virtur pólitíkus í USA. Hann lét ekki nægja að segja hvers vegna hann var á móti heldur þurfti hann líka að útskýra hvernig netið virkar og þessi maður veit sko hvernig það virkar eins og sést bersýnilega af ummælum hans hér fyrir neðan! Að svona menn fái að taka ákvarðanir um netið (það er líka til upptaka af þessu hér):

There’s one company now you can sign up and you can get a movie delivered to your house daily by delivery service. Okay. And currently it comes to your house, it gets put in the mail box when you get home and you change your order but you pay for that, right.

But this service isn’t going to go through the interent and what you do is you just go to a place on the internet and you order your movie and guess what you can order ten of them delivered to you and the delivery charge is free.

Ten of them streaming across that internet and what happens to your own personal internet?

I just the other day got, an internet was sent by my staff at 10 o’clock in the morning on Friday and I just got it yesterday. Why?

Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the internet commercially.

So you want to talk about the consumer? Let’s talk about you and me. We use this internet to communicate and we aren’t using it for commercial purposes.

We aren’t earning anything by going on that internet. Now I’m not saying you have to or you want to discrimnate against those people […]

The regulatory approach is wrong. Your approach is regulatory in the sense that it says “No one can charge anyone for massively invading this world of the internet”. No, I’m not finished. I want people to understand my position, I’m not going to take a lot of time. [?]

They want to deliver vast amounts of information over the internet. And again, the internet is not something you just dump something on. It’s not a truck.

It’s a series of tubes.

And if you don’t understand those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and its going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material.

Now we have a separate Department of Defense internet now, did you know that?

Do you know why?

Because they have to have theirs delivered immediately. They can’t afford getting delayed by other people.

[…]

Now I think these people are arguing whether they should be able to dump all that stuff on the internet ought to consider if they should develop a system themselves.

Maybe there is a place for a commercial net but it’s not using what consumers use every day.

It’s not using the messaging service that is essential to small businesses, to our operation of families.

The whole concept is that we should not go into this until someone shows that there is something that has been done that really is a viloation of net neutraility that hits you and me.

Athugasemdir